International Terrorism (Answer the questions) Scholarship Essay

International Terrorism (Answer the questions) - Scholarship Essay casing4. Explain each of Samuel Huntingtons 8 cultural paradigms. What does this model for culture and civilization around the world r shuttinger to do with terrorism What be the implications for law enforcement if terrorism has deeper roots-namely, rooted in a clash of civilizations Also, what are the implications for American foreign policy efforts to thwart terrorism5. Describe anarchist and socialist movements of the 19th Century. Which activists in spite of appearance those movements were most pivotal in giving us terrorism as we know it today Also, in your own opinion, how should modern America deal with fomenters of political violence when they do so while in exile through writing and speaking Should America go after such people given over the observation from history that opposite exiled thinkers/revolutionaries have had great influence with reddish and long-standing consequencesTerrorism comes from the Latin leger for terror or fear, but an objective and universally accepted rendering of the word is knockout up to the present moment for the simple reason that what may be look atn as frightening or terrifying by the victims of terrorist acts may be seen, from the side of the terrorists and those who support them, as acts of daring, courage, and heroism. This issue of three several(predicate) perceptions of an act - the terrorist, the victim, and the public - that leads to different understandings and definitions of the act is part of our common experience (Schmid, 1997). For example, a triathlete may see his/her punishing dietary and exercise regimens as forms of discipline to attain success and glory, but a non-triathlete would alone view it as pointless vain masochism.Definitions range from the simple the usance or threatened call of force designed to bring about political change (Jenkins, 1985) to the concise policy intended to come with terror those against whom it is adopted the employment of methods of intimidation (OED, 2002) and the complex as in the Patriot Act definition (U.S. Congress, 2001, Sec. 808). The most balanced among the wide range of definitions is proposed by the FBI (1999) Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or whatever segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. The FBI definition includes the key elements that characterize terrorist acts (Schmid, 1983) (1) use of unlawful violence or force, (2) a political aim, and (3) the main targets are civilians.The point against all other definitions is that these are too specific and contain too many details that clutter understanding (how violent acts are carried out, which systems are used, motives and intentions of perpetrators, etc.). It is unavoidable that in any society, some have grievances they want addressed by observing due processes to preserve so cial order. The terrorist disrespects the process and performs acts to intimidate society and the ruling power, thinking that the end justifies the means. This mentality is rooted in Machiavelli (1997) and, based on centuries of experience, leads to more intimidation, oppression, less freedom, and more violent