The History Use Of Prosthetics Health And Social Care Essay

The History Use Of prosthetics Health And Social parcel step to the fore EssayThe circumstance prosthetic device mess be delineate as an hokey replica that replaces sympathetickind damaged or lost personate sectionalization. In the field of arthroplasty or juncture replacement surgery, prosthetic device is defined as an artificial reciprocal that replaces the arthritis affected or damaged adult male vocalisation (i.e., bone joint). The primary objective of the arthroplasty is to relief patients from arthritis pain in summation with restoring joint functions. Though in most of the cases the reason backside the arthroplasty is the arthritis pain, its nary(prenominal) only the reason. Human articulations stomach be damaged by severe impacts or unusual stresses. Prostheses argon usually made for sympathetic main joints such as hip, knee, jostle, lift, wrist joint joint and so forth Long term results of the arthroplasty dep residue to a great extent on the qualit y of prosthesis implantation. The application of the robotics technology in the field of arthroplasty reduces the inaccuracy that occurred in conventional joint replacement surgery such as misalignment, rotation error, resection etc.On the other(a) dig, in the field of biomechatronics (i.e., the science of f utilise artificially intelligent devices with the human body), prosthesis is defined as an artificial substitute for a absent body part. Human offset amputation can causes due to trauma, tumor, congenital, disease, etc. h weapononize to biomechatronics, prostheses argon considered as those which replace human lost arms and legs. The victimization of the biomechatronics furnishs useful technology for the robotic prosthesis. Robotic prosthesis act as an ext oddmented body part of the amputees by using which amputees can be able to act his/her casual animateness activities and take c be of them by using their aver body functions. As a result, robotic prostheses provide an separate life and more(prenominal) productive role of these people in the society.In addition with the prostheses mentioned above, artificial eyes, teeth, artery, and heart valves ar too correctly termed as prostheses.TRANSHUMERAL PROSTHESIS FOR ABOVE-ELBOW AMPUTEESTranshumeral prosthesis can be defined as a prosthesis that is knowing for the people who ca-ca lost their arm just above the elbow joint (i.e., above-elbow amputees). Human arm amputation can ca utilise due to congenital (birth defect), tumor, trauma, disease, etc. circulatory disease, cancer and infections are considered as the major categories of disease which whitethorn require surgical removal of human arm. Moreover, the civil wars and more specifically wars in Sri Lanka, Iraq and Afghanistan producing an unprecedented number of amputees. Although nothing can ever pass away a perfect substitute for a missing arm, the intension of the transhumeral prosthesis is to compensate for the lost functions of the above -elbow (AE) amputees absent arm, so that they can lead an indep break offent life and play more productive role in the society. diachronic EVOLUTION OF THE PROSTHETIC ARMProstheses take been found a make out for thousands of long time, til now real advancement and fabrication of the prostheses have started about 500 years ago 01. According to the medical museum exhibited at the University of Iowa titled History of Prostheses, earlier prostheses were used by spends dating back to 484 B.C. Hegesistratus a Persian soldier round 490 B.C. cut off part of his own feet in pose to escape from the prison and later replaced it with a wooden foot 02. In 61 A.D., Pliny the Elder wrote about the Roman General Marcus Sergius who had lost his refine arm during the Second Punic War (218-201 B.C.). Later he had replaced that by an iron arm to support his shield and he returned to battle 03. During the centre ages, 15th and 16th centuries nonfunctional prostheses were usually made from iron. At that period, blacksmiths and arms makers designed the prostheses for the soldiers after mannequining their suits of armor. In the 16th century, the great cut arm surgeon Ambrose Pare, designed several limb prostheses in addition with practicing surgical amputation. In 1818, Peter Baliff appears to have been the first person to bring the use of the trunk and shoulder girdle muscles as sources of effect to drop dead the prosthetic arm. In 1844, the first transhumeral amputation replacement used Baliffs principle to dupe fold for the elbow joint 03. The prosthetic arm using this invention is termed as Mechanical or Body provide prosthetic arm and still extremely famous among the amputees society. By 1860, the Crimean and Italian campaigns of the French conglomerate left many soldiers in need of prostheses, and their call was answered by the Comte de Beaufort 01 03. The Comte de Beaufort designed several limb prostheses using the articles of clothing, pulleys and levers. A fter the World War I and II, a tremendous loss of manpower in USA and europium served as a catalyst for the rapid development of the prosthetic arm. In 1948, N. heel proposed the concept of Cybernetics i.e., the study of control and communication between the human and the machine 04, which plays an important role later for the development of the prosthetic arm. In 1949, Samuel Anderson created the first galvanizingally powered prosthetic arm using the foreign power with support from the US Govt. and IBM. The first myoelectric arm was developed by Russians in 1958 and later on Otto Bock Company revealed the commercially procurable prosthetic arm for general application which was the first made versions of the Russian design 03.CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROSTHETIC ARMprosthetic arms can be grouped into three general categories1) Non-functional or Cosmetic prosthetic Arm As the name implies functioning of these prostheses has less priority than the appearance, weight, wearing comfor t and easy handling. These are the oldest and getable for 2000 years. Though cosmetic prostheses project a more natural look and feel, they sacrifice functionality and versatility while also being relatively pricey 05.2) Mechanical or Body Powered Prosthetic Arm The power to operate these prostheses comes from the users own body. In this system, the user wears a harness that translates the shoulder apparent drive into elbow plication inquiry and action of gravity force commences the elbow extension motion. The earliest model of this prosthetic arm was the Ballif arm 06. These prosthetic arms are fallible weight and less expensive than the others however it requires large amount of forces to truly move the elbow 07.3) Externally Powered Prosthetic Arm near advanced commercially available prosthetic arm in which power to operate the prosthetic arm comes from the external sources such as electric motor and battery pack. Most of these prostheses are operated by using user s jumble arm muscles electromyogram signals. This type of prostheses provides greater proximal functions, increased cosmetic appeal but also tend to be much heavier and expensive than any of the other categories 07.Present offer and Proposed Transhumeral Prosthesis new-fashioned take place in biomechatronics technology brings a lot of benefit to increase the mobility of above-elbow (AE) amputees in their casual life activities. A transhumeral or AE prosthetic arm is used to compensate for the lost functions of the AE amputees absent arm. A number of commercial prosthetic arms have been developed since last few decades. However, many amputees have not used them due to the discrepancy between their expectations and the reality. The main factors causation a loss of interest in presently available prosthetic arms include low functionality and poor controllability 08.Since the concept of Cybernetics proposed by N. Wiener 04, a number of look for works have already been carried out a nd are ongoing for the development of prosthetic arm. At present, Utah arm, capital of Massachusetts Elbow, and Otto Bock are considered as the pioneers in this field which are shown in Fig. 1 09-12. However, currently, commercial prosthesis available on the market for the AE amputees provides a limited DOF. Most of these prostheses provide elbow flexion-extension motion with a storage device attached at the end. In addition to the elbow motion, rough prostheses provide fortify supination-pronation motion and a single DOF at the destruction device for grasping object. Some passive DOF, which are useful to generate an optimal pre-determined configuration during performing certain tasks 13, are sometimes include in the prostheses. Commercially available expensive cosmetic prostheses offer a more natural appearance and simple control. However, their dexterity is relatively rattling poor compared to the human arm. Human arm generates precise and abstruse motions during daily life activities which are almost impossible to be generated by using a limited DOF prosthetic arm. As a result, the presently available commercial prostheses have failed to gain wide acceptance among AE amputees.Figure 1 Commercially unattached Externally Powered AE Prosthetic Arm 14.In order to improve the quality of life of AE amputees and to increase their mobility in daily life activities (like, eating, drinking, dressing, brushing etc.), a 5 DOF externally powered transhumeral prosthesis is proposed in this thesis. The prosthesis is designed to generate elbow flexion-extension, forearm supination-pronation, wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation, and hand grasp-release motion. Currently, no commercial transhumeral prosthesis provides a combination of wrist flexion-extension and radial-ulnar deviation motion, which have uttermost importance to perform daily life activities. In recent years, a number of prostheses capable of generating multi-DOF motion have been proposed for f number limb amputees 13, 15-19. However, none of these provide a combination of forearm and 2 DOF wrist motion with the exception of an arm designed for above-wrist amputees to provide wrist flexion-extension and forearm motion 18.Bio-Mechanics of Human Upper Limb in the first place develop a robotic arm system to mimic to the human arm, the natural philosophy of the human upper limb should be thoroughly studied. Accordingly the upper limb mainly consists of three major components, the shoulder manifold, elbow composite and wrist joint. Mainly the shoulder complex is built with three get up, clavicle, shoulder blade and humerus and four articulations the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular and scapulothoracic, with the thorax as a stable base.The only commove of skeletal attachment of the upper extremity to the trunk occurs at the sternoclavicular (SC) joint. At this joint the clavicle joints to the sternum, the middle bones of the rib cages. The clavicle is affiliated to the shoulder bone at its distal end via the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. At this joint, most of the straw mans of the scapula on the clavicle occur, and the joint handles large middleman stresses as a result of high axial loads that are transmitted through and through the joint.The scapula interfaces with the thorax via the scapulothoracic (ST) joint. This is not a typical articulation, connecting bone to bone. Rather, it is a physiological joint containing neurovascular, muscular, and bursal structures that allow for a smooth motion of the scapula on the thorax. The final articulation in the shoulder complex is the shoulder complex is the shoulder joint, or the glenohumeral (GH) joint. Motions of the shoulder joint are represented by the movements of the arm. This is a synovial ball-and-socket joint that offers the greatest seethe of motion and movement potential of any joint in the body.The shoulder complex can be mimic to a ball-and-socket joint and can be modeled accordingly. The proximal part of the humerus, humeral head and the female part of the scapula, glenoid cavity respectively act as the ball and the socket of the joint. The main motion of the shoulder joints are shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. During this each motion, the position of the centre of rotation of the shoulder joint changes.The distal part of the humerus is connected to the elbow joint or the radioulnar joint. The elbow is considered a stable joint, with structural integrity, good ligamentous support, and good muscular support. It consists of three bones of the arm and the forearm, humerus, radius and ulna. Movements between the forearm and the arm takes place at the ulnohumeral and radio-humeral articulations, and movements between the radius and the ulna take place at the radioulnar articulations.The ulnohumeral joint is the articulation between the ulna and the humerus and is the major contributing join t to flexion and extension of the forearm. The joint is the union between the spool-like trochlea on the distal end of the humerus and the trochlear notch on the ulna. The second joint participating in flexion and extension motion of the forearm is the radiohumeral joint. At the distal end of the humerus is the articulating surface for this joint, the capitulum, which is supheroidal and covered with cartilages on the anterior and deficient surface. The top of the round radial head butts up against the capitulum, allowing radial movement around the humerus during flexion and extension. The capitulum acts as a buttress for lateral compression and the other rotational forces absorbed during throwing and other rapid forearm movements. The trine articulation, the radioulnar joint, establishes movement between the radius and the ulna in pronation and supination. There are actually two radioulnar articulations, the superior in the elbow joint region and the inferior near the wrist. Also, midway between the elbow and the wrist is another fibrous connection between the radius and the ulnar, recognized by some as a third radioulnar articulation.The hand is mainly used for manipulation activities requiring actually fine movements incorporating a wide variety of hand and finger postures. Consequently, there is much interplay between the wrist joint positions and efficiency of finger actions. The hand region has many stable yet very mobile segments, with complex muscle and joint actions. The wrist consists of 10 small carpal bones but can be functionally divided into the radiocarpal and the midcarpal joints. The radiocarpal joint is the articulation where movement of the whole hand occurs. The radiocarpal joint involves the broad distal end of the radius and two carpals, the scaphoid and the lunate. There is also minimal contact and involvement with the trinquetrum. This ellipsoid joint allows movement in two planes flexion-extension and radial-ulnar flexion. It shou ld be noted that wrist extension and radial and ulnar flexion primarily occur at the radiocarpal joint but a good destiny of the wrist flexion is developed at the midcarpal jointsWrist motions are generated around an instantaneous center. The path of the centrode is small, however, customarily, the displacement of the instantaneous center of rotation is do by and the rotation axes for the flexion/extension and ulna/radial deviation are considered to be fixed. The axes pass through the capitate, a carpal bone articulating with the third metacarpal. Although it is considered that wrist joint motions are generated with respect to the two axes, some research 11 has proved that the motions are generated with respect to four axes. The wrist flexion bloc vertebra and the extension axis vertebra are different. Similarly the radial deviation axis and the ulnar deviation axis are also different. Therefore, the 2DOF of the wrist are through four axes. Although flexion and extension motion s have different axes they are intersected in a point in capitates. Similarly, radial and ulnar deviations axes are also intersected. When we consider that flexion and extension motions have one axis and similarly ulnar and radial deviations have one axis, the slight scratch of the rotational axes of the flexion/extension and the radial/ulnar deviation is close to 5 mm 8, 12.In addition the motion ranges of the upper limb are as follows.23G. Thompson and D. Lubic, The Bionic Arm New Prosthetic Devices fusee drive Man and Machine, Seventh Annual Freshman Conf., pp. 1-8., April 5, 2007.History of Prostheses, 2008, UIhealthcare.com. Available at http//www.uihealthcare.com/depts/medmuseum/wallexhibits/body/histofpros/histofpros.htmlR. H. Meier, D. J. Atkins, Functional Restoration of Adults and Children with Upper Extremity Amputation, Demos Medical make Inc. New York, 2004.N. Wiener, CYBERNETICS or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press, 1948.S. Nasser, D. Rincon, and M. Rodriuez, object of an Anthropomorphic Underactuated Hand Prosthesis with Passive-Adaptive Grasping Capabilities, in Proc. of Florida Conf. on Recent Advances in of Robotics, Florida, May 25-26, 2006.W. J. Gaine, C. Smart, and M. B. Zachary, Upper Limb Traumatic Amputees Review of Prosthetic Use, journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 22B, no. 1, pp.73-76, 1997.J. A. Doeringer and N. Hogan, Performance of preceding(prenominal) Elbow Body-Powered Prostheses in Visually Guided Unconstrained Motion Tasks, IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 42, no. 6, pp.621-633, 1995.M. C. Carrozza, P. Dario, F. Vecchi, S. Roccella, M. Zecca, and F. Sebastiani, The Cyberhand On the Design of a Cybernetic Prosthetic Hand think to be Interfaced to the Peripheral Nervous System, in Proc. of 2003 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp.2642-2647, 27-31 Oct., 2003.S. downwind and G. N. Saridis, The Control of a Prosthetic Arm by EMG posture Recognition, IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., vol. 29, pp. 290-302, 1984.S. C. Jacobson, D. F. Knutti, R. T. Johnson, and H. H. Sears, Development of the Utah Artificial Arm, IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 249-269, April, 1982.R. N. Scott and P. A. Parker, Myoelectric Prostheses State of the Art, Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 143-151, 1988.Otto Bock Arm Prostheses, Available at http//www.ottobock.com.M. Troncossi, V. P. Castelli, and A. Davalli, Design of Upper Limb Prostheses A New Subject-Oriented Approach, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine Biology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 387-390, 2005.D. H. Plettenburg, Upper Extremity Prosthesis Current Status and Evaluation, VSSD Publications, 2006.A. Z. Escudero, J. Alvarez, and L. Leiza, Development of a Parallel Myoelectric Prosthesis for Above Elbow Replacement, in Proc. of Second Joint EMBS/BMES Conf., pp. 2404-2405, Houston, TX, USA, Oct. 23-26, 2002,T. Tsuji, O. Fukuda, H. Shigeyoshi, and M. Kaneko Bio-Mimetic Impedance Control of an EMG-Controlled Prosthetic Hand, in Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 377-382, 2000.O. Fukuda, T. Tsuji, M. Kaneko, and A. Otsuka, A Human-Assisting Manipulator Teleoperated by EMG Signals and Arm Motions, IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp.210-222, 2003.K. Ito, T. Tsuji, A. Kato, and M. Ito, An EMG Controlled Prosthetic Forearm in Three Degree of Freedom Using Ultrasonic Motors, in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Engineering and Biology Society, vol. 4, pp.1487-1488, 1992.Y. Saito, A. Ogawa, H. Negoto, and K. Ohnishi, Development of Intelligent Prosthetic Hand suitable to Age and Body Shape, in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp.384-389, Chicago, USA, 2005.C. P. Neu, J. J. Crisco and S. W. Wolfe, In Vivo Kinematic behavior of the Radio-Capitate Joint during Wrist Flexion-Extension and Radio-Ulnar Deviation, J. Biomech., vol. 34, pp. 1429-1438, 2001.F. H. Martini, M. J. Timmons, and R. B. Tallitsch, Human Anatomy, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc, 2003, ch. 8.Y. Youm, Design of a make out Wrist Prosthesis, Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 12, pp. 247-262, 1984.D.C Boone and S.P Azen, Normal Range of Motion of Joints in Male Subjects, in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 61, pp.756-759, 1979. www.jbjs.org